An unimportant, uninteresting man is hidden behind an almost-sneering woman wearing a black leather corset, thigh-high stockings, shiny black leather gloves and holding a flogger. She is ostensibly preparing to do something with that flogger, but it seems that instead she is enthralled by this amazing technology called a camera, which is pointed directly at her.
So, for one day only, I’ve decided to do something different with this site. Instead of showing you male submission, I’m going to show you female dominance—and not the good stuff, but the wretched, frustratingly misguided, infuriatingly common crap pornographers try to pass off as being “marketed for submissive men." I’m doing this for a few reasons, which I’ll share throughout the day. (Happy April Fools’ Day!)
One reason is because I’m still completely baffled as to why many people continually suggest images to me that are so obviously about a dominant woman instead of being about a submissive man, which is expressly what this site is trying to avoid.
Kind of like this photograph actually, which, as you can see, has absolutely nothing to do with male submission and instead is entirely about (really unattractive, fake-looking) female dominance. I mean, fuck, you barely even see his hand! There is zero connection between the dominant woman and submissive man in this photo. Why is he even there? He might as well not be, because she’s clearly more interested in the photographer than her own submissive play partner. As a submissive man, being uninteresting to my top is not sexy to me. And really, why is that a goddamn newsflash to anyone?
Now, I’d have nothing against this picture if I hadn’t found it by searching for "male submission pictures” and ending up at a “femdom gallery” site. There are so many things I find aggravating about that series of events, but as this is getting kind of long already, I’ll just say see also my entire other blog.
-maymay